Stop all animal testing and stop all animal cruelty. Wild animals also nurse their wounds, show distress, and seek shelter. [28] The types of animals covered by the AWA account for fewer than one million animals used in research facilities each year, which leaves around 25 million other animals without protection from mistreatment. Good () students. Its not a question of right or wrong. It was a welcomed relief. Animal rights activists argue that it is morally wrong to subject animals to experiments, while those in favor of animal testing claim that it is necessary for scientific . [52] Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University (UK), states that its very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what were trying to achieve in the human. [53] Thomas Hartung, Professor of evidence-based toxicology at Johns Hopkins University, argues for alternatives to animal testing because we are not 70 kg rats. [54], The 1950s sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities, was tested on animals prior to its commercial release. We can use human cells and tissue, 3D printing, robots, and computer modeling to get more accurate results faster. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.. The main reason for banning animal testing, aside from sparing animals the pain, is that we dont need it. Imagine mice, rabbits, rats, and guinea pigs with their eyes burned from drip chemicals or toxic potions smeared into their exposed skin tissue without pain medication. [15][50][51], The Environmental Protection Agency is so confident in alternatives that the agency intends to reduce chemical testing on mammals 30% by 2025 and end it altogether by 2035. Additionally, some medicines that may work for us are dangerous for animals. Should K-12 students dissect animals in science classrooms? Read more. Doesnt this issue demonstrate once more that such powerful agenda-setting tool like a European Citizens Initiative http://www.citizens-initiative.eu/ is nothing more than another facade to propagate EU (fake) democracy by the invisible treaty authors? Proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism, and that strict regulations prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories. Heart. Just let the technology develop and replace the animals as the technology will be cheaper, so be adopted quickly when it is perfected. Animal testing in the United States is regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), passed in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.The AWA defines "animal" as "any live or dead dog, cat, monkey (nonhuman primate mammal), guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or such other warm blooded animal." Your email address will not be published. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. [43] Manufacturers of products such as hand sanitizer and insect repellent, which can protect people from Zika, malaria, and West Nile Virus, test on animals to meet legal requirements for putting these products on the market. Without the required regulations from regulators, they won . [19] The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki states that human trials should be preceded by tests on animals. Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Of course it couldnt be because what they eat is what you live by. Treatments for animals developed using animal testing also include pacemakers for heart disease and remedies for glaucoma and hip dysplasia. This is not about thanking the cosmetic industry (Europe, India, Israel) for condemning and banning animal tests. Cells in a petri dish cannot yet replace whole living systems, she said. [107] [129] [130] Humane Research Australia (HRA) reports that many discoveries made by non-animal methods were later verified by animal experiments, giving false credit to animal use. In this new century of new and more advanced technology, there are numerous more effective, efficient, and cheaper alternatives to animal testing. Con 9. Feelings. Discuss both views and give your opinion. The electrode is implanted to . [130], ProCon/Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. by Kristy Castellanos | Arts and Entertainment, Opinion. The animals who are left alive after studies are rarely adopted out to families or placed into sanctuaries for proper care, leaving them to fend for themselves. People believe in science as proof. However, it's been estimated that at least 50 million animals are used in the U.S. every year. What Cause Extinction What Can We Do To Stop It? This test measuring toxicity often leads to blindness, scarring, death, and insurmountable pain. Animal Testing (Argumentative Essay Sample) - EssayBasics Yes And Someone is Paying Attention, Swimming with The Seahorse: Discover Their Mystical Charisma. Says It Will Drastically Reduce Animal Testing. PETA published statistics showing that, just in the United States, there are over 100 million animals that suffer through testing and even die every year. Animal Testing Quotes (8 quotes) - Goodreads This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Instead, lab animals endure inhumane procedures and treatments like scorched skin, immobilization, inhaling toxic fumes, and holes drilled in their skull and spinal cords crushed. [1][2][26][102] [135] The US Department of Agriculture, which inspects facilities for AWA compliance, compiles annual statistics on animal testing but they only include data on the small percentage of animals subject to the Act. Human beings often volunteer for human trials to help find cures for human diseases. Exactly that would be total violation of human rights and on my Christian perspective supercede animal rights if you think it would be acceptable to test potentially dangerous products on humans then you should have no problem killing Jews and other burdens to society , the European Commission rejected proposals in a European Citizens Initiative.. Hunting proponents argue that hunting is safe, effective, necessary, and inexpensive to taxpayers. 3. Aspirin, for example, is dangerous for some animal species. Do you think animal testing is important in these sectors or any others? Read the text please. That is a bad score. Read more 8 Difficult, strict norms though, same as with meat and milk consumption. It is unethical to test on animals. Cruel and torturous animal testing runs rampant in our world today. 89% of scientists surveyed by the Pew Research Center were in favor of animal testing for scientific research. [36][37][38][39][40], American women use an average of 12 personal care products per day, so product safety is of great importance. Its one of the main reasons the debate gets so heated: animals have feelings too. According to the Humane Society of the United States,a large majority of the animals used in experiments and testing are euthanized, or killed during or after the experiment. The first fact is that animals suffer. ? Of course !! In fact, in the contemporary world non-animal experimental research is humane, less time consuming, less expensive, as well as, more accurate. [138] In the US, California became the first state to make it illegal to sell most cosmetics that underwent animal testing. Would you want to take a drug whose risks you have no idea about? Animal Testing has been a highly debated and ongoing topic for many years. [15] Technological advancements in 3D printing allow the possibility for tissue bioprinting: a French company is working to bioprint a liver that can test the toxicity of a drug. Marc Bekoff, PhD, former Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Colorado and author of The Emotional Lives of Animals, wrote in an Oct. 11, 2013 email to ProCon.org: "There is no reason to continue to use nonhuman animals for scientific or commercial testing. Those. HIV, schizophrenia, Parkinsons disease, heart disease, and certain types of cancer are human diseases. Lets only test on humans! Animal Testing Essay Examples (Pros and Cons) - Free Argumentative A Jan. 2020 report from the USDA showed that in one year of research, California used more cats (1,682) for testing than any other state. [30], Research animals are cared for by veterinarians, husbandry specialists, and animal health technicians to ensure their well-being and more accurate findings. [5] Later tests on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered at extremely high doses. Or would it risk scaring off biomedical research companies? For cosmetics it was already done. Crustacean Chronicles: A Deep Dive into the Fascinating World of the Crab, Pet Food Manufacturers and Who Rules the Roost in a Growing Market. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. 5. Animal testing or animal experimentation is the use of animals for researches and studies, by subjecting them to drugs, tests, and experiments, that may alter their biological, physical . It's wasteful. Resolved: Animal testing is ineffective, unethical, and wasteful and should be replaced with non-animal methods. So why do we continue to abuse, cage, cripple, infect, and kill dogs, cats, monkeys, mice, and rats in animal experiments? A. . Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection, Gale, 2021. This is why animal testing should be banned because it's downright cruel and brutal to make these poor animals suffer through that much pain, when most of the time their deaths are in vain. [9] All mammals, including humans, are descended from common ancestors, and all have the same set of organs (heart, kidneys, lungs, etc.) [29][9] Mice and rats are particularly well-suited to long-term cancer research, partly because of their short lifespans. Free. recently said it would move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals. One of her proudest accomplishments is typing while petting a fur baby on her lap. Shes experienced living abroad and believes that together people can evoke change for the better. It just is. Approximately 225 million animals are used for testing every year. You have to test on something, but i would like to see the law that forces to use Artificial Intellgence first (AI). Although there will always be a risk when testing new items, even after animal research has provided positive data, the risks to a human without animal research would be incredibly high. when no alternatives exist. Many have created modern, effective non-animal testing methods that are cost-effective, fast, and deliver more accurate results without animal testing. Why Animal Testing Should be Banned Today. But India and some other countries have banned the sale of any cosmetics or cosmetics ingredients that have been tested on animals. I rather wish to humiliate humans and ready to work in this industry :D. Yes, computer models and stem cells much better. Animal research projects are only permitted wenn they are necessary, i.e. Cells come from animals! They are filled with hormones and antibiotics and you eat it. For example, cows and humans share about 80%, and common fruit flies about 61%. Them. Cite This Work Animal experimentation needs to end. Even there is still war, one goal of EU is stopping that. Opinion: Community colleges have more to offer than what meets the eye, Technology: A double-edged sword in classrooms, Boys basketball stages late comeback against Laguna Beach Breakers. Yearly, over $12 billion in taxpayer money is wasted on research on animals. ProCon.org is the institutional or organization author for all ProCon.org pages. Global Network of organisations who educates people in debate in order to give young people a voice for their ideas. It is cruel and selfish for humans to test on animals and no animal deserves to be locked up all day let alone have chemicals and all sorts of stuff rubbed on their skin, squirted into their eyes or shoved down their throats. It fully answers all parts of the task - explaining the arguments ' for ' in the first paragraph and the arguments ' against ' in the next. The very first reason why animal testing should be banned is elementary: it is cruel and unnecessary. The only fairer alternative is to let humans suffer and die from diseases, like they used to, until about a few centuries ago.". In 2016, another miracle drug that was reportedly going to treat all kinds of conditions killed a volunteer and left four patients with devastating brain damage. Adult proponents of the ban MUST get ONLY those types of medical treatment that were developed without animal experiments. If this was painful to read, the article has done its job. Educational and informative news and resources on debate, advocacy and activism for youth. Poor. https://levmm1.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/the-pros-and-cons/#comments. 8.10: Animal Testing Should Be Banned - Humanities LibreTexts Others argue that scientific progress has helped save millions of human lives. Write a reply Selena May 26th, 2020 Yes you are right. It also contains many other alternatives such as cell culture, tissue culture, computer models which can easily replace testing on animals. Approximately 17-22 million animals are used for testing each year in the United States. Animal testing for cosmetic reasons, that is realy bad. Biological drugs like antibodies and antibodies used as tools for scientific research are developed in whole live animals and then their spleens must be taken out to follow up with the hybridoma technology. Nearly every type of human and animal cell can be developed in a laboratory. [68], Devoting enough money and resources to animal-free alternatives could result in the same medical advances achieved through animal testing. Just as the horse is on the way out. [23], In addition to local and state laws and guidelines, animal research has been regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) since 1966. I speak for myself and Your absolutly good remark about the clean air is as important as the ban on which we are sharing our individual opinions. [55][56], Some chemicals that are ineffective on (or harmful to) animals prove valuable when used by humans. The E.P.A. All animal cruelty should be illegal and laws enforced. Is. According to PETA, the inflammation-blocking agents tested on animals through 150 trials worked for the animals, yet not a single one worked for human patients because the genetic responses between mice and humans were different. Animal testing should be abolished because it is unethical and inhumane, it violates animal welfare, as well as more accurate alternatives that could be used, have been developed. The most common animals that are used are mices, rats, and primates. Every individual has the power to influence change. One good example of this case is the Draize Test, where the eyelids of the test rabbits are being held . is the answer you looking for Europe . Animal research facilities should promote the health of animals, not human health. We want proper animal testing because we dont want harmful chemicals to end up in our food, air and water.. Shes proud of her two Pushcart Nominations, her debut novel, and her marriage. Scientists and pharmaceutical firms use this approach to test cosmetics, foods, and other products people use daily. Awareness campaigns are only a starting point. Could it! [17] Because animals and humans are so biologically similar, they are susceptible to many of the same conditions and illnesses, including heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. Many of the pharmaceuticals end up being too dangerous and ineffective for human consumption. Likewise the different species we see today. Archive website - Please visit www.idebate.net for up to date Animal testing should be banned because it is an unethical process. We do test directly on humans, they are called clinical trials. Accordingly, animal experimentation should not be banned. Managing Editor Read more background, The California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. Affirmative Argument Millions of mice, rats, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked inside barren cages in laboratories across the country to be used in experiments. [109][110] Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market. Moral answer is STOP. According to the statistics reviewed by the National Institute of Health, only 5% of drugs tested on animals show positive results, while 95% are worthless. Their upkeep is extremely expensive. Required fields are marked *. Other voluntary studies include employing brain scanning machines to help see the insides of the brain, microdosing which gives volunteers small doses of potential new drugs to the human body, and other less technologically complicated research can be done on consenting people who volunteer to try new treatments. 2. Animals and Humans dont have the same DNA what works for them could be harmful for us! 4. Who is the author? By banning the use of animal testing while using our modern technological alternatives, we can ensure that we can continue improving peoples lives while helpless animals are protected. No for 3 reasons: [137] At least 37 countries have banned or restricted the sale of cosmetics with ingredients tested on animals, including nations in the European Union. Seems, EU citizens are considered useful democratic idiots who are allowed to waste their time & money on sentimental issues- which could be left to the responsible science community to handle. I am here to tell you why there should be a ban on animal testing. On Sept. 10, the Environmental Protection Agency said it would move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals, a decision that was hailed by animal rights. Animal testing should not be part of a university lab experiment paid for by the tax-payer who is against animal torture in the first place. Two years later, in June 2015, the European Commission rejected proposals in a European Citizens Initiative to also ban animal testing in scientific research. Many organizations like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), World Animal Protection, and many others are vocal about this practice. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/01/learning/is-animal-testing-ever-justified.html. ProCon.org. WorldAnimalFoundation.org, Today's Deal: $300 Discount on Halo 2+ GPS Dog Collar. [133] [119] Nikolai Petrovsky, professor in the College of Medicine and Public Health at Flinders University in Australia, said testing a coronavirus vaccine on animals is absolutely essential and skipping that step would be fraught with difficulty and danger. [133], Researchers have to test extensively to prevent vaccine enhancement, a situation in which a vaccine actually makes the disease worse in some people. Origins of Sexual Orientation. I see no reason to test on animals while there are pedophiles, murderers and politicians around we can use. Yet you will eat animals who are grossly over medicated to increase their size and deforms their shape outrageously. How important is animal testing in relation to e.g. The Dark Truth behind Bear Bile Uses: Hidden Costs of Traditional Medicine, The Untold Story of Factory-farmed Cows the Consequences for Animal and Human Health, Are Giraffes Endangered? Animal testing should not be banned because it is essential for medical research and has led to many important breakthroughs. Which, once upon a time, was covered in them? Our interest isnt in speed, its getting it right. This debate affects many people both directly and indirectly because new medications and products must first pass tests in animals before they can be approved for human use . Why? But for medical reasons it seems to be unavoidable. 5 Reasons Why Animal Testing Should Ban Worldwide - Tampa Bay News Wire [134] Humane Society International found that animal tests were more expensive than in vitro (testing performed outside of living organisms) in every scenario studied. The use of human tissues shows that there are alternatives to studying and harming animals by using more humane, safe, and effective methods. The Enigmatic Wombats: Surprising Facts and Myths Debunked. Animals. The Ethics of Animal Experimentation - HOPES Huntington's Disease 2) In certain contexts, no one has yet found a way to fully substitute an entire organism, and you need one to know what will the effect of a substance be in that context (not recreated by cell cultures, and not entirely by computer models; the latter can be used but if your main question is to know what will the effect of this drug be in an organism, you wont get that answer unless the organism is there; see the concept of ADMET); for example: certain antibiotics can cause cardiac arrhythmias; what if a drug intended to control diabetes causes cancer?